Our speciality is defending federal employees against disciplinary actions.
Approximately 20,000 federal employees are subject to disciplinary actions a year. Our nationwide federal employee lawyers represent federal employees in these disciplinary cases before their federal agencies. Each disciplinary action defense is unique and should be evaluated by attorneys familiar with federal employment law.
Defending Thousands of Federal Employees Over the Past 25 Years in Disciplinary Cases
There are different types of disciplinary actions for federal employees. These vary and can include letters of counseling, reprimands, suspensions, demotions, and removals. For most serious disciplinary actions, referred to as adverse actions (usually removals), a federal employee first receives a notice of the proposed discipline and is given the opportunity to respond. A proposal will have an explanation of the conduct or issues leading to the proposed disciplinary action.
If a federal employee is issued a notice of proposed disciplinary action, they will have the opportunity to contest it before it becomes final. Most permanent federal employees (past their probationary period) are entitled to significant due process rights. In responding, a federal employee can choose to provide a written response, an oral response, or both. We often recommend providing both oral and written responses.
Request Disciplinary Materials (Materials Relied Upon)
In most disciplinary cases, it is important for federal employees to request all of the materials that have been relied upon by the agency in proposing the discipline. Sometimes these are attached to the proposal, and other times they must be requested separately. We request these materials before responding on behalf of federal employees at the beginning of a case. These materials provide the basis for the proposed disciplinary action.
Draft a Written Response
It is important to prepare a complete written response to the allegations in proposed disciplinary cases. These responses are typically 7 to 20 pages in length, depending on the underlying facts and number of charges and specifications. Most written responses are typically due anywhere from 7 to 30 days after a proposal is provided to a federal employee.
The written response will address the alleged charges of misconduct or performance and any relevant mitigating factors (also known as the Douglas factors). In our responses, we also provide available evidence that contradicts the charges. Additionally, we attach declarations, affidavits, good performance records, character support letters, and other helpful exhibits.
Presenting the Oral Response
The oral response portion of a federal employee’s response can be very important. While written responses can be critical in refuting specific allegations, there is something very important about personally meeting with a Deciding Official that is making the decision. We think that in serious cases, oral responses can make a significant difference in outcomes. We represent federal employees during oral responses. Typically, during an oral response, the federal employee, their attorney, and the Deciding Official (often with their counsel) will be present. The attorney and federal employee will get a chance to argue against the disciplinary action directly to the decisionmaker.
After the oral response, there is usually a few weeks to a few months until a decision is made on the proposed discipline. During that time, there is also the possibility that attorneys from both sides can resolve the discipline through settlement.
Appeals from Adverse Disciplinary Decisions
If an unjust disciplinary decision is sustained by a federal agency, there are various options for federal employees to appeal further. If serious enough, an individual can appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Other potential appeals can include filing Equal Employment Opportunity complaints or whistleblower appeals, where applicable. There are also a number of other types of appeals that may be brought, but legal advice is important when making such decisions.
Reach Out to a Federal Employee Lawyer
When a federal employee receives or anticipates a proposed disciplinary action, it is important to have an attorney represent or advise them from the beginning. Our lawyers represent federal employees nationwide in all types of federal employee discipline. We can be contacted at www.berrylegal.com or by telephone at (703) 668-0070.
Federal employees can face disciplinary actions for a wide range of issues, from minor reprimands to proposed removals. When your federal career is on the line, understanding the process and asserting your rights is critical.
At Berry & Berry, PLLC, our federal employment attorneys represent federal employees nationwide in disciplinary and adverse action cases. With decades of experience defending federal workers, we help protect careers, benefits, and professional reputations.
Federal Disciplinary and Adverse Actions Explained
Federal disciplinary actions vary and include:
Letters of counseling or warning
Letters of reprimand
Suspensions (14 days or fewer)
Demotions
Proposed removals
More serious penalties, those involving suspensions over 14 days, demotions, and removals are considered adverse actions with additional legal rights given to federal employees.
Step-by-Step: the Federal Disciplinary Process
The following includes the 8 parts of the federal disciplinary process that federal employees should consider when going through a disciplinary action.
1. Receiving the Proposed Action
When an agency issues a notice of proposed discipline or an adverse action, it should:
Explain the allegations or performance issues
List relevant deadlines
Provide (or be requested to provide) the evidence relied upon
There are usually at least 2-3 deadlines in a proposed action that you have to consider. These include: (1) the deadline to request the materials relied upon, (2) the deadline to request an oral response; and (3) a deadline to submit the written response. Deadlines can be short (as few as 7 days) or up to 30 days. Missing a deadline can forfeit your right to respond. In some cases, deadline extensions can be sought.
2. Request All Materials Relied Upon
Federal employees have the right to review the agency’s evidence before responding. These materials may include:
Investigation reports
Emails, video, recordings, or documents
Witness statements
Having the full file is essential for crafting a strong written response.
3. How to Prepare a Comprehensive Written Response
Your written response should:
Address all allegations
Refute inaccuracies
Include supporting exhibits (declarations, rebuttal evidence, performance records, character letters)
It’s often detailed (7–20 pages or more), and should also include mitigation arguments known as the Douglas factors — criteria used to argue for a reduced penalty even if some misconduct occurred.
4. Prepare an Oral Reply
In important disciplinary cases, presenting an oral reply before a Deciding Official can make a significant difference. This is your chance to:
Emphasize key arguments
Highlight mitigating circumstances
Reinforce why discipline should be reduced or withdrawn
Experience in oral advocacy can directly influence outcomes.
5. Understanding the Douglas Factors
The Douglas factors are used in federal disciplinary cases to argue for a lesser penalty. Established by the MSPB in Douglas v. Veterans Administration, they include considerations such as:
Length of service
Past performance and awards
Absence of prior discipline
Whether the offense was intentional or negligent
Agencies must consider these factors when determining a reasonable penalty.
6. What Happens After Your Response
Once written and oral responses are complete, the agency’s Deciding Official issues a final decision. Outcomes may include:
Disciplinary action upheld
Penalty reduced
Proposed action rescinded
You’ll also receive a notice outlining your appeal rights.
7. Appeals Options After an Adverse Action
If the final decision is adverse, you may have one or more appeal options depending on your circumstances.
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) – appeals for adverse actions like removals and long suspensions
Agency grievance procedures – if covered by a union contract
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaints – if discrimination or retaliation is involved
Office of Special Counsel (OSC) – for whistleblower retaliation claims
Deadlines for appeals are strict — often as few as 30 days — so prompt legal support is essential.
8. Why You Need an Experienced Federal Employment Lawyer
Defending a federal disciplinary action is not just procedural, it is a chance to reverse or mitigate damage to a federal employee’s career. A skilled attorney can:
Analyze and challenge agency evidence
Identify procedural errors
Craft persuasive mitigation arguments
Navigate complex appeals, including MSPB and OSC complaints
With decades defending federal employees, Berry & Berry, PLLC helps clients protect their jobs, benefits, and retirement.
Frequently Asked Questions About Federal Employee Disciplinary Actions
What should I do after receiving a proposed suspension or removal?
After receiving a notice of proposed discipline, you typically have a limited amount of time to respond before a final decision is made. This is your primary opportunity to challenge the agency’s allegations, present evidence, and argue for a lesser penalty. Many employees choose to consult an attorney at this stage because an effective response can sometimes prevent or reduce discipline before it becomes final.
How long do I have to respond to a federal disciplinary action?
Response deadlines vary by agency and the type of action, but employees are commonly given 7 to 30 days to submit a written response and request an oral reply. These deadlines are strict, and missing them can limit your ability to influence the outcome. The proposal notice should specify the exact timeframe.
Can I respond orally instead of in writing?
In many cases, federal employees are entitled to both a written response and an oral reply to the deciding official. An oral reply allows you to address concerns directly, clarify misunderstandings, and humanize your position. Written responses, however, are often critical because they create a record that may later be reviewed on appeal.
What are the Douglas Factors and why do they matter?
The Douglas Factors are a set of criteria agencies must consider when determining an appropriate penalty, including your work history, intent, consistency of discipline, and potential for rehabilitation. A strong response often focuses on these factors to argue that the proposed penalty is excessive or unreasonable. Addressing the Douglas Factors can significantly affect the final outcome.
Do I need an attorney before a final decision is issued?
While representation is not required, many federal employees seek legal guidance during the proposal stage because this is when discipline can sometimes be mitigated or avoided altogether. Once a final decision is issued, options may become more limited and costly. Early legal involvement can help ensure your response is strategic and complete.
Can disciplinary actions be appealed to the MSPB?
Some disciplinary actions, such as removals, demotions, and lengthy suspensions, may be appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Eligibility depends on factors such as your employment status, length of service, and the nature of the action. Appeal rights are typically explained in the final decision notice.
Get Help Today
If you’ve received a proposed disciplinary or adverse action, don’t wait. Contact us for experienced legal representation at (703) 668-0070 or click here.
The 2019 primaries and 2020 national elections are approaching soon. Our law firm often represents and defends federal employees in Hatch Act violation cases. The Hatch Act was meant to curtail partisan political involvement for federal employees. There are certain restrictions that prohibit certain political conduct, both on-duty and off-duty. As these elections approach, this article is meant to help federal employees avoid the problems of committing potential Hatch Act violations.
What is the Hatch Act?
The Hatch Act was first proposed by Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico and enacted in 1939 prohibiting certain types of political participation by federal employees. This can vary between types of federal employees. For most federal employees, however, the rules are similar. Federal employees may not seek public office in partisan elections, use their official titles or authority when engaging in political activities, solicit or receive contributions for partisan political candidates or groups, and/or engage in political activity while on duty. Even some non-partisan elections can give rise to Hatch Act violations by federal employees if a candidate is sufficiently backed by a particular party.
Office of Special Counsel Enforcement for Hatch Act Violations
For most federal employees, the Hatch Act is enforced by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). The OSC has the ability to seek disciplinary action against federal employees if violations are uncovered. Typically, violations are investigated following a complaint being filed with the OSC. Federal employees can potentially be disciplined or terminated for violations of the Hatch Act. Generally, the OSC will first conduct a detailed investigation into the allegations and then if violations are found they may then seek to negotiate a resolution with the alleged offender.
Photo by Aaron Kittredge on Pexels.com
In other cases, the OSC may file inform the individual that they are simply moving ahead with a disciplinary action filing with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) against the employee (usually seeking removal) and ask an MSPB administrative judge to take action against the federal employee for at the violations.
General Hatch Act Tips for Federal Employees
Federal employees are encouraged to seek advice before engaging in political activities. There are many types of federal employees and some are more restricted than others. Here are 8 simple tips for federal employees seeking to avoid potential Hatch Act violations:
1. Don’t run for office in a partisan political election;
2. Avoid partisan political discussions while in the federal workplace or while performing work;
3. Don’t try to raise funds for partisan political candidates in the workplace (even passing along website links for candidates to co-workers);
4. Don’t post political opinion or discussion during work hours on social media;
5. Don’t donate to a political campaign during work hours;
6. Don’t bring political campaign signs or buttons into the federal workplace;
7. Don’t use government resources (email, internet) to engage in partisan politics; and
8. Don’t use your government title or affiliation to endorse a political candidate.
Federal employees can usually still participate in many political activities, but doing so at work can be a violation of the Hatch Act. Federal employees can sometimes be candidates for non-partisan elections, assist in voter registration drives, express political opinions, attend fundraisers, sign nominating petitions or hold office in political parties.
For further information on potential Hatch Act violations, please see the information offered by the OSC. While it is doubtful that brief discussions about politics in the federal workplace would trigger an OSC investigation, the potential risk is there. The safest course for federal employees is to simply avoid partisan politics in the workplace and save them for off-duty.
Conclusion
If you need assistance with Hatch Act defense or other federal employment law issues, please contact our office at (703) 668-0070 or at www.berrylegal.com to schedule a consultation. Please also visit and like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/BerryBerryPllc.
